Klaviyo prices email on active profiles: every contact a brand can email, whether or not it opted in. The free plan covers 250 active profiles and 500 email sends a month. Paid plans rise with list size, starting at $20 a month for up to 500 profiles, and text messages are a separate plan priced in dollars per message.
We compete with Klaviyo, so read this as an informed-but-interested guide. The pricing mechanics below are accurate and vendor-neutral; the recommendation at the end is ours. If you just want the short version: the fastest way to cut a Klaviyo bill is to stop paying for contacts who never open anything, and the structural way is to send fewer, better-decided messages to the people who opted in.
Klaviyo has three billing levers:
The important detail is the unit of pricing: contacts you could email, not revenue those contacts produce. That single design choice explains almost every Klaviyo pricing complaint.
Three things, in order of how often they surprise brands:
List growth is treated as a cost, not just an asset. Every subscriber who has not opened an email in a year still counts toward your tier until it is suppressed, because Klaviyo counts any profile it can email, regardless of consent status. Brands routinely pay for tens of thousands of contacts that produce nothing.
Because pricing steps up in bands, adding a few hundred contacts near a threshold can push you into the next tier and a noticeably higher bill, even if sending volume barely changed. Between 10,001 and 13,500 active profiles, Klaviyo's tiers are 500 profiles apart and each one costs $25 a month more.
SMS is a separate plan. A healthy text program is valuable, but it is a second bill running alongside the email plan, and it is easy to under-budget: Klaviyo bills SMS per segment, and a message over 160 characters (70 with an emoji) splits into more than one segment.
If you are staying on Klaviyo, these levers genuinely help:
These reduce the bill, but you are still paying for every profile Klaviyo can email, opted in or not. The structural fix is to send fewer, better-decided messages to the people who did opt in.
Two paths. You can move to another flow-based tool - Mailchimp, Omnisend, Brevo - and price it at your own list size; we cover that in Klaviyo vs Mailchimp and Klaviyo vs Omnisend. Or you can leave the flow model entirely.
That second path is what Relvino is. It prices one monthly plan by the size of your consented list, then runs autonomous 1:1 decisions - offer, timing, and channel per shopper in ~80ms - and wins by sending fewer, smarter messages, with 80% less spam. Brands that switch pay 90 to 95% of their old Klaviyo or Attentive bill. See Relvino pricing.
Klaviyo pricing is not unfair, it is just built on a unit that rewards a bigger list: every profile you can email, opted in or not. If your bill keeps climbing while results plateau, prune your list and tighten your sends first. Then ask whether you should keep paying for people who never opted in. Orion Sleep saw 50% higher revenue than Klaviyo's flows. Compare the two models in Klaviyo vs Relvino, or side by side on the Klaviyo vs Relvino comparison page.
Start by pruning and suppressing inactive profiles, because you pay for contacts you could email whether or not they engage. Then send fewer, better-targeted campaigns to reduce send volume and protect deliverability, right-size your plan tier to the contacts you actually email, and budget mobile messaging spend as a separate line. Klaviyo does not downgrade your plan automatically, so choose the lower tier yourself once your profile count updates. These help, but the bill is still tied to every profile you can email.
It depends on list size and plan, so price both at your own contact count on each vendor's own pricing page. For a Shopify brand, the right comparison is not just sticker price but revenue per dollar spent. We cover it in detail in Klaviyo vs Mailchimp for Shopify.
For an early-stage brand, yes - the Shopify integration and template library earn it. For a larger brand with a lean team and plateauing results, the value question flips, because you are paying more each year to maintain a system that treats a segment as one person. At that point brands weigh the cost against autonomous decisioning.
Other flow-based tools like Mailchimp, Omnisend, and Brevo publish their own pricing, so compare them at your list size. Relvino prices one monthly plan by the size of your consented list and runs fewer, smarter 1:1 sends, with 80% less spam. Brands that switch pay 90 to 95% of their old Klaviyo or Attentive bill.
No - it usually helps. Contacts who never engage do not produce revenue, but they do inflate your tier and drag down deliverability, which quietly hurts the sends that do matter. Suppressing them lowers cost and improves inbox placement at the same time.
With Relvino, the technical migration takes about 30 minutes: connect DNS, install the Shopify app, and your data ingests automatically. Flows are turned off, not rebuilt. From there a 14-day pilot proves revenue side by side - pause Klaviyo rather than cancelling, and compare.
It depends on the channel, the recipient's country and, in the US and Canada, whether you send from a toll-free number or a short code. Klaviyo now prices mobile messages in dollars per message instead of credits (the change began on July 13, 2026), and each account's rates are listed in its billing settings. An SMS is billed per segment per recipient, so a send costs the rate times the recipients times the segments.
Connect email and SMS, install the Shopify app, and share your brand assets and any CRM data. We read your brand voice from your website, and you set your guardrails. You pay what you were paying Klaviyo, or less (brands pay 90 to 95% of the old bill).
99.5% deliverability with under 0.5% spam, because we send on our own infrastructure. That is higher than Klaviyo or Attentive at scale.